The methodology section of a research paper answers two main questions: How was the data collected or generated? The writing should be direct and precise and always written in the past tense.The introduction to your methodology section should begin by restating the research problem and underlying assumptions underpinning your study.Descriptions of methods usually include defining them and stating why you have chosen specific techniques to investigate a research problem, followed by an outline of the procedures you used to systematically select, gather, and process the data [remember to always save the interpretation of data for the discussion section of your paper].Tags: Colorado State University Mfa Creative WritingTerm Paper BadmintonMeaning Of Patriotism EssayBelieve Myself EssayFree Poultry Farming Business PlanStrategic Business Plan OutlineOrwell Essays Everyman'S LibraryMini Research PaperIrac Contracts Essay
wiki How's Content Management Team carefully monitors the work from our editorial staff to ensure that each article meets our high quality standards. The research methodology section of any academic research paper gives you the opportunity to convince your readers that your research is useful and will contribute to your field of study.
An effective research methodology is grounded in your overall approach – whether qualitative or quantitative – and adequately describes the methods you used.
The description of how you prepared to study the research problem, how you gathered the data, and the protocol for analyzing the data should be organized chronologically.
For clarity, when a large amount of detail must be presented, information should be presented in sub-sections according to topic.: If you are conducting a qualitative analysis of a research problem, the methodology section generally requires a more elaborate description of the methods used as well as an explanation of the processes applied to gathering and analyzing of data than is generally required for studies using quantitative methods.
The description of the project's methodology complements a list of sources in that it sets forth the organization and interpretation of information emanating from those sources.. However, while theories and methods are often related, it is important that, as a researcher, you deliberately separate them in order to avoid your theories playing a disproportionate role in shaping what outcomes your chosen methods produce.
Introspectively engage in an ongoing dialectic between the application of theories and methods to help enable you to use the outcomes from your methods to interrogate and develop new theories, or ways of framing conceptually the research problem.Justify why you chose those methods over others, then explain how those methods will provide answers to your research questions.Common examples are qualitative video analysis, photography analysis, qualitative interviews, group discussions, discourse analysis and biographical research.This is followed by situating the methods you will use to gather, analyze, and process information within the overall “tradition” of your field of study and within the particular research design you have chosen to study the problem.If the method you choose lies outside of the tradition of your field [i.e., your review of the literature demonstrates that the method is not commonly used], provide a justification for how your choice of methods specifically addresses the research problem in ways that have not been utilized in prior studies.: Once you have written all of the elements of the methods section, subsequent revisions should focus on how to present those elements as clearly and as logically as possibly.If this is the case, you must include a statement in your methods section that you received official endorsement and adequate informed consent from the IRB and that there was a clear assessment and minimization of risks to participants and to the university.This statement informs the reader that your study was conducted in an ethical and responsible manner.This article was co-authored by our trained team of editors and researchers who validated it for accuracy and comprehensiveness.Together, they cited information from 19 references.You should make the assumption that readers possess a basic understanding of how to investigate the research problem on their own and, therefore, you do not have to go into great detail about specific methodological procedures.The focus should be on how you applied a method, not on the mechanics of doing a method.